‚‹´ ”ü‰À
Œ¤‹†“à—eF
‡@¶¬•¶–@(ƒ~ƒjƒ}ƒŠƒXƒgEƒvƒƒOƒ‰ƒ€)iŒÂlŒ¤‹†j
‡A–òŠwEˆãŠw‰pŒê‚̃f[ƒ^ƒx[ƒXì¬EŒ¾Œê‰ðÍ(‘“à‹¤“¯Œ¤‹†j
Œ¤‹†‹ÆÑF
ƒ˜_•¶„
"ECM with CP Complements as Raising -to-Edge:Evidence from Japanese and
Romanian," Explorations in English Linguistics 20, 63-90•Å, 2006”N
"Phase and Exceptional Case-marking,"“Œ–k–ò‰È‘åŠwˆê”Ê‹³ˆçŠÖŒW˜_W 19, 1-21•Å, 2005”N
"Remarks on ECM Constructions with Infinitiva‚Œ Complements," Explorations in English Linguistics 18, 79-113•ÅA2003”N
"Deriving Superiority Effects from the PIC," Explorations in English Linguistics 17, 119-147•Å, 2002”N
"On 'Minimal Link Condition Effects'," English Linguistics 18-2, 378-403•Å, 2001(b)”N
"Maximal Feature Matching and the MLC," Explorations in English Linguistics 16, 63-97•Å, 2001(a)”N
"Earliness and Maximal Feature Matching," JELS 18, 201-210•ÅA2000(b)”N
"On 'Locality' Phenomena: An Alternative Approach to the MLC,"
Explorations in English Linguistics 15, 67-90•Å, 2000(a)”N
ƒ”ŽŽm˜_•¶„
Optimality in Syntactic Derivations, “Œ–k‘åŠw•¶ŠwŒ¤‹†‰È, 2003”N
Š‘®Šw‰ïF
“ú–{‰pŒêŠw‰ïA“ú–{Œ¾ŒêŠw‰ïA“ú–{‰p•¶Šw‰ï
E—ðF
2001”N‚P‚OŒŽ`2002”N‚RŒŽ@“Œ–k‘åŠw ’ZŠú‹³–±•ⲈõiŒ¤‹†•Žèj
2002”N‚SŒŽ`2003”N‚RŒŽ@“Œ–k‘åŠw ƒŠƒT[ƒ`EƒAƒVƒXƒ^ƒ“ƒg
2003”N‚SŒŽ`2005”N‚RŒŽ “Œ–k–ò‰È‘åŠw ”ñí‹ÎuŽt
2005”N‚SŒŽ`@ “Œ–k–ò‰È‘åŠw uŽt